I see it as a draft to be rewritten and as I have to go through the English/French translation process for my bilingual site, I can make the style my own at each step of the way, but I’m still not satisfied enough.

I know the feeling. I don’t use it as a research tool anymore because of incorrect responses, but no doubt that will change. Still and all, one of the comments I received after my first published experiment is that the reader missed my writing style.
Clearly even I can tell that I hadn’t written it. ☺️
Bard appears better in writing style to me, but even though it is a Google product, I would have thought the facts would be correct.

I did enjoy trying out the software to see what it would do. It was an interesting experiment.
I haven’t done it yet, but I will probably experiment some with Photoshop’s new Generative AI.

Nah, let it stay as it is. Better for English teachers trying to discern, lol.

Thanks, VJ! The good news for me is that I can take the writing criticism as I didn’t write it. >grin<
Seriously, AI writing has a long way to go.

It has been a fun experiment. I haven’t yet jumped “on board” for the Generative AI in Photoshop, but I expect I will at some point.

Good point, Sarah. Not being an teacher of English, I probably missed some errors. I also noted it’s predilection of repetition in the many experiments I did before committing any to publication. I probably got used to the style.